TELEPHONE
CONVERSATION and DEDICATION
-Wole
Soyinka
Soyinka’s Telephone
Conversation depicts a conversation between a white lady and an African
American man which casts a harsh light on the racism and prejudice which grips
society. The title reveals the fact that two people are talking on the phone,
so the beginning of the poem is on a positive note: The man is searching for a
house and the land lady has named a considerable price, and the area where it
is located is an impartial and not racially prejudiced. Also the man could
enjoy his privacy as the land lady does not live under the same roof. The
African man is ready to accept the offer, but maybe there has been a similar
incident in his past, for he stops and admits to her that he is black, saying
he prefers not to waste the time travelling there if she’s going to refuse him
on that bounds.
Wole Soyinka uses two main
literary devices to drive home the message of the poem. The first of the two is
imagery. Right at the beginning, the imagery used to describe the mental image
the man has of the woman: “lipstick coated, gold rolled cigarette holder
piped”, just from listening to her voice shows one that he thinks that she is,
socially speaking above him, from a higher social class. Then when he hears her
question regarding how dark he is, he is so humiliated and angry that he sees
red everywhere. The imagery of the huge bus squelching the black tar is
symbolic of how the dominant white community treats those belonging to the
minor black one.
The next most evident use is that of irony. In the beginning of the poem, the African says that he has to “self-confess” when he reveals his skin color to the lady. The color of his skin is something that he has no control over, and even if he did, it is not a sin to be dark skinned, so the fact that the man feels ashamed and sorry for this is ironical and casts light on how ridiculous racism is that one should apologize or be differentiated against solely because of the color of one’s skin. Also, it seems almost comical that anyone should be so submissive when he has actually committed no mistakes.
On the other hand, the lady is continuously described in positive terms, suggesting that she is of a good breeding and upper class. Even when the reader finds out that she is a shallow and racist person who exhibits extreme insensitivity by asking crude questions, the man seems to think that she is ‘considerate; and her clinical response to his question shows only ‘light impersonality.’ The repeated and exaggerated assertions of the woman’s good manners and sophistication drip with irony as her speech contradict this strongly.
Also the basis of the woman rejecting to lease her house to the man is because of the prejudiced notion that African Americans are a savage and wild people. This idea is completely discredited by the ironical fact that throughout the poem the man retains better manners and vocabulary than the woman, using words such as “spectroscopic” and “rancid”, whereas she does not know what West African Sepia is and is inconsiderate in her inquiries. Using irony in this manner, Soyinka proves how absurd it is to judge the intellect or character of a man depending on the color of his skin only.
The next most evident use is that of irony. In the beginning of the poem, the African says that he has to “self-confess” when he reveals his skin color to the lady. The color of his skin is something that he has no control over, and even if he did, it is not a sin to be dark skinned, so the fact that the man feels ashamed and sorry for this is ironical and casts light on how ridiculous racism is that one should apologize or be differentiated against solely because of the color of one’s skin. Also, it seems almost comical that anyone should be so submissive when he has actually committed no mistakes.
On the other hand, the lady is continuously described in positive terms, suggesting that she is of a good breeding and upper class. Even when the reader finds out that she is a shallow and racist person who exhibits extreme insensitivity by asking crude questions, the man seems to think that she is ‘considerate; and her clinical response to his question shows only ‘light impersonality.’ The repeated and exaggerated assertions of the woman’s good manners and sophistication drip with irony as her speech contradict this strongly.
Also the basis of the woman rejecting to lease her house to the man is because of the prejudiced notion that African Americans are a savage and wild people. This idea is completely discredited by the ironical fact that throughout the poem the man retains better manners and vocabulary than the woman, using words such as “spectroscopic” and “rancid”, whereas she does not know what West African Sepia is and is inconsiderate in her inquiries. Using irony in this manner, Soyinka proves how absurd it is to judge the intellect or character of a man depending on the color of his skin only.
The poem deals with a foul
subject, that of racism and prejudice, in a lighthearted, almost comical
manner. A most important device which Soyinka has used to highlight this sense
of racism, which was previously widespread in western society, is that of the
telephone. Had the person been speaking face to face with the lady, this whole
conversation would never have taken place. She would have either refused
outright, or would have found a more subtle way of doing so. The whole back and
forth about ‘how dark’ the man is wouldn’t have occurred. Thus the telephone is
used to make the issue of racism clear and prove how nonsensical it really is.
Written in an independent style and delivered in a passively sarcastic tone, this poem is a potent comment on society. Soyinka might be speaking through personal experience, judging by the raw emotions that this poem subtly convey: those of anger, rage, shame, humility and an acute sense of disgust at the apathy and inhumanity of humans who won’t judge a book by its cover but would turn down a man for the color of his skin. In today’s world, racism might be a dying concern; but that does not mean that discrimination against other minorities has been completely eradicated. Despite the progressing times, people continue to harbor prejudices and illogical suspicions about things they do not understand: may it be others ideals, religions or traditions and customs. Thus this poem remains a universal message for all of us, as Soyinka manages to convey just how absurd all prejudices are by highlighting the woman’s poor choice of rejecting the man just because he does not share the same skin color. ‘Telephone Conversation’ is a favorite, both for its excellent use of rich language and the timeless message it conveys.
Written in an independent style and delivered in a passively sarcastic tone, this poem is a potent comment on society. Soyinka might be speaking through personal experience, judging by the raw emotions that this poem subtly convey: those of anger, rage, shame, humility and an acute sense of disgust at the apathy and inhumanity of humans who won’t judge a book by its cover but would turn down a man for the color of his skin. In today’s world, racism might be a dying concern; but that does not mean that discrimination against other minorities has been completely eradicated. Despite the progressing times, people continue to harbor prejudices and illogical suspicions about things they do not understand: may it be others ideals, religions or traditions and customs. Thus this poem remains a universal message for all of us, as Soyinka manages to convey just how absurd all prejudices are by highlighting the woman’s poor choice of rejecting the man just because he does not share the same skin color. ‘Telephone Conversation’ is a favorite, both for its excellent use of rich language and the timeless message it conveys.
No comments:
Post a Comment